<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: all the subtext in Kevin Spacey&#8217;s apology	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://sorrywatch.com/all-the-subtext-in-kevin-spaceys-apology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://sorrywatch.com/all-the-subtext-in-kevin-spaceys-apology/</link>
	<description>Analyzing apologies in the news, media, history and literature. We condemn the bad and exalt the good.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2020 17:54:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Al and Louie &#124; SorryWatch		</title>
		<link>https://sorrywatch.com/all-the-subtext-in-kevin-spaceys-apology/#comment-212386</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Al and Louie &#124; SorryWatch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 21:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sorrywatch.com/?p=5398#comment-212386</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] far better than their predecessors. This is a low bar. There was no attempt at distraction (a la YEP I&#8217;M GAY) and no accompanying legal threats, so, uh, [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] far better than their predecessors. This is a low bar. There was no attempt at distraction (a la YEP I&#8217;M GAY) and no accompanying legal threats, so, uh, [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Old Rockin' Dave		</title>
		<link>https://sorrywatch.com/all-the-subtext-in-kevin-spaceys-apology/#comment-212170</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Old Rockin' Dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2017 07:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sorrywatch.com/?p=5398#comment-212170</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What is a shaken apology?
It&#039;s obvious. Leon Wieseltier prefers his apologies shaken, not stirred.
And taken with vodka, and a little vermouth.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is a shaken apology?<br />
It&#8217;s obvious. Leon Wieseltier prefers his apologies shaken, not stirred.<br />
And taken with vodka, and a little vermouth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Duane Day		</title>
		<link>https://sorrywatch.com/all-the-subtext-in-kevin-spaceys-apology/#comment-212051</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Duane Day]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2017 19:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sorrywatch.com/?p=5398#comment-212051</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Consider a hypothetical: Rapp&#039;s description is 100% accurate, but Spacey honestly has no memory whatsoever of assaulting Rapp. Spacey is aware that he has a history of &quot;deeply inappropriate drunken behavior,&quot; including behavior of a nature that makes Rapp&#039;s account entirely plausible to him. Spacey also knows that his previous unwillingness to &quot;deal with [his sexual orientation] honestly and openly&quot; has caused him to issue false public statements (e.g. after the 2004 incident in a London park). To continue to &quot;protect his privacy&quot; at this moment would require him to act as if Rapp&#039;s accusation couldn&#039;t be true. Thus, Rapp&#039;s accusation being made public creates an absolute moral imperative for Spacey to drop his long-held public pretense that he isn&#039;t gay.

That&#039;s the subtext I&#039;m seeing in the totality of Spacey&#039;s statement. I don&#039;t see one iota of &quot;it probably didn&#039;t happen&quot; anywhere in there. I also don&#039;t see any apology for being gay, but I do see an implicit acknowledgement that trying to hide his sexuality has caused him to be dishonest in the past, and that continuing that effort at the present moment would be unthinkable. And in the linking of his coming out to his responding to this accusation, and in the absence of any denial that he&#039;d ever done anything like what Rapp says he did, I see an implicit acknowledgement that it&#039;s plausible to Spacey that the accusation is entirely true.

I&#039;m a fan of Sorrywatch, but I think you may have gotten this one wrong. I&#039;m not saying Spacey&#039;s apology is anywhere near perfect, but I think there&#039;s a whole lot more genuine &quot;mea culpa&quot; in there than you perceived.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consider a hypothetical: Rapp&#8217;s description is 100% accurate, but Spacey honestly has no memory whatsoever of assaulting Rapp. Spacey is aware that he has a history of &#8220;deeply inappropriate drunken behavior,&#8221; including behavior of a nature that makes Rapp&#8217;s account entirely plausible to him. Spacey also knows that his previous unwillingness to &#8220;deal with [his sexual orientation] honestly and openly&#8221; has caused him to issue false public statements (e.g. after the 2004 incident in a London park). To continue to &#8220;protect his privacy&#8221; at this moment would require him to act as if Rapp&#8217;s accusation couldn&#8217;t be true. Thus, Rapp&#8217;s accusation being made public creates an absolute moral imperative for Spacey to drop his long-held public pretense that he isn&#8217;t gay.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the subtext I&#8217;m seeing in the totality of Spacey&#8217;s statement. I don&#8217;t see one iota of &#8220;it probably didn&#8217;t happen&#8221; anywhere in there. I also don&#8217;t see any apology for being gay, but I do see an implicit acknowledgement that trying to hide his sexuality has caused him to be dishonest in the past, and that continuing that effort at the present moment would be unthinkable. And in the linking of his coming out to his responding to this accusation, and in the absence of any denial that he&#8217;d ever done anything like what Rapp says he did, I see an implicit acknowledgement that it&#8217;s plausible to Spacey that the accusation is entirely true.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a fan of Sorrywatch, but I think you may have gotten this one wrong. I&#8217;m not saying Spacey&#8217;s apology is anywhere near perfect, but I think there&#8217;s a whole lot more genuine &#8220;mea culpa&#8221; in there than you perceived.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: snarly		</title>
		<link>https://sorrywatch.com/all-the-subtext-in-kevin-spaceys-apology/#comment-212025</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[snarly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Nov 2017 00:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sorrywatch.com/?p=5398#comment-212025</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://sorrywatch.com/all-the-subtext-in-kevin-spaceys-apology/#comment-212021&quot;&gt;Cat&lt;/a&gt;.

Point taken. You&#039;re right -- age is the deciding factor. Thanks for the comment.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://sorrywatch.com/all-the-subtext-in-kevin-spaceys-apology/#comment-212021">Cat</a>.</p>
<p>Point taken. You&#8217;re right &#8212; age is the deciding factor. Thanks for the comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Cat		</title>
		<link>https://sorrywatch.com/all-the-subtext-in-kevin-spaceys-apology/#comment-212021</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2017 23:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sorrywatch.com/?p=5398#comment-212021</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[one little thing in this (otherwise stellar) post: the &quot;look at him when he was 14&quot; bit is a little... unpleasant. it opens the door for people who make comments like &quot;well he/she LOOKED much older&quot;. age is the deciding factor here, the ONLY relevant factor. not his appearance.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one little thing in this (otherwise stellar) post: the &#8220;look at him when he was 14&#8221; bit is a little&#8230; unpleasant. it opens the door for people who make comments like &#8220;well he/she LOOKED much older&#8221;. age is the deciding factor here, the ONLY relevant factor. not his appearance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Frako Loden		</title>
		<link>https://sorrywatch.com/all-the-subtext-in-kevin-spaceys-apology/#comment-211924</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frako Loden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 01:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sorrywatch.com/?p=5398#comment-211924</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Go you! You are master of the GIF.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go you! You are master of the GIF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
