<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: At least it&#8217;s a good apology?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://sorrywatch.com/at-least-its-a-good-apology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://sorrywatch.com/at-least-its-a-good-apology/</link>
	<description>Analyzing apologies in the news, media, history and literature. We condemn the bad and exalt the good.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2020 14:52:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: tanita		</title>
		<link>https://sorrywatch.com/at-least-its-a-good-apology/#comment-198549</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tanita]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 18:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sorrywatch.com/?p=4353#comment-198549</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What we DON&#039;T get in apologies, good or otherwise, is the &quot;WHY!?&quot; And, unfortunately, that&#039;s what I want to know. BUT, I realize that &quot;whys&quot; aren&#039;t apologies; many times &quot;I was drunk&quot; (which, clearly, c&#039;mon...) or its equivalent is a reason given, but a reason is not an excuse, and an excuse is certainly not an apology. So, we&#039;re honestly better off not knowing why but still - scratching my head and just... wondering what his problem might be. But, probably better off not knowing/caring.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What we DON&#8217;T get in apologies, good or otherwise, is the &#8220;WHY!?&#8221; And, unfortunately, that&#8217;s what I want to know. BUT, I realize that &#8220;whys&#8221; aren&#8217;t apologies; many times &#8220;I was drunk&#8221; (which, clearly, c&#8217;mon&#8230;) or its equivalent is a reason given, but a reason is not an excuse, and an excuse is certainly not an apology. So, we&#8217;re honestly better off not knowing why but still &#8211; scratching my head and just&#8230; wondering what his problem might be. But, probably better off not knowing/caring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: sumac		</title>
		<link>https://sorrywatch.com/at-least-its-a-good-apology/#comment-198543</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sumac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 16:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sorrywatch.com/?p=4353#comment-198543</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://sorrywatch.com/at-least-its-a-good-apology/#comment-198539&quot;&gt;smc&lt;/a&gt;.

Talk to her entourage about it....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://sorrywatch.com/at-least-its-a-good-apology/#comment-198539">smc</a>.</p>
<p>Talk to her entourage about it&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: smc		</title>
		<link>https://sorrywatch.com/at-least-its-a-good-apology/#comment-198539</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[smc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 14:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sorrywatch.com/?p=4353#comment-198539</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great apology, but with or without it, I&#039;ll bet Knightly is rightly pissed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great apology, but with or without it, I&#8217;ll bet Knightly is rightly pissed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
