<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: British feminists not sorry for not being very feminist	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://sorrywatch.com/british-feminists-not-sorry-for-not-being-very-feminist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://sorrywatch.com/british-feminists-not-sorry-for-not-being-very-feminist/</link>
	<description>Analyzing apologies in the news, media, history and literature. We condemn the bad and exalt the good.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2020 02:45:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Wendy M. Grossman		</title>
		<link>https://sorrywatch.com/british-feminists-not-sorry-for-not-being-very-feminist/#comment-1377</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wendy M. Grossman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 11:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sorrywatch.com/?p=790#comment-1377</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You left out all the class stuff (I realize there&#039;s a limit...). Part of the Burchill/Moore contention is that the trans group attacking them are Oxbridge-educated oppressors while Burchill and Moore are that rare thing: working class women who&#039;ve made it on their own in the national press - and single moms, on top of that. When I got around to reading the background on this yesterday, that really stood out to me as a complicating factor. There&#039;s a whole extra background of grievance there.

wg]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You left out all the class stuff (I realize there&#8217;s a limit&#8230;). Part of the Burchill/Moore contention is that the trans group attacking them are Oxbridge-educated oppressors while Burchill and Moore are that rare thing: working class women who&#8217;ve made it on their own in the national press &#8211; and single moms, on top of that. When I got around to reading the background on this yesterday, that really stood out to me as a complicating factor. There&#8217;s a whole extra background of grievance there.</p>
<p>wg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ed Ward		</title>
		<link>https://sorrywatch.com/british-feminists-not-sorry-for-not-being-very-feminist/#comment-1335</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed Ward]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sorrywatch.com/?p=790#comment-1335</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Julie Burchill Says Unapologetic Stupid Thing, film at 11. British punk&#039;s answer to Ann Coulter. The only thing that makes this different from her countless others is the social media catching her and shaming her with it. With luck, she&#039;ll do a few more of these and then be toast. English toast, cold and in a metal rack.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julie Burchill Says Unapologetic Stupid Thing, film at 11. British punk&#8217;s answer to Ann Coulter. The only thing that makes this different from her countless others is the social media catching her and shaming her with it. With luck, she&#8217;ll do a few more of these and then be toast. English toast, cold and in a metal rack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
