<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Equifax hack&#8217;s lax apology vexes	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://sorrywatch.com/equifax-hacks-lax-apology-vexes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://sorrywatch.com/equifax-hacks-lax-apology-vexes/</link>
	<description>Analyzing apologies in the news, media, history and literature. We condemn the bad and exalt the good.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2020 17:46:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Letting bylines be bylines		</title>
		<link>https://sorrywatch.com/equifax-hacks-lax-apology-vexes/#comment-211016</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Letting bylines be bylines]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2017 18:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sorrywatch.com/?p=5356#comment-211016</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] on SorryWatch, why Equifax&#8217;s apology sucked. (I am particularly proud of this very old-school-Variety [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] on SorryWatch, why Equifax&#8217;s apology sucked. (I am particularly proud of this very old-school-Variety [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: sumac		</title>
		<link>https://sorrywatch.com/equifax-hacks-lax-apology-vexes/#comment-210961</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sumac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 00:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sorrywatch.com/?p=5356#comment-210961</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://sorrywatch.com/equifax-hacks-lax-apology-vexes/#comment-210957&quot;&gt;Linda S&lt;/a&gt;.

You&#039;re absolutely right. A point we made in this USA Today story:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2017/09/11/equifax-flails-after-announcing-enormous-breach/654149001/

After all, when did a credit-reporting company ever seem eager to please you?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://sorrywatch.com/equifax-hacks-lax-apology-vexes/#comment-210957">Linda S</a>.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re absolutely right. A point we made in this USA Today story:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2017/09/11/equifax-flails-after-announcing-enormous-breach/654149001/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2017/09/11/equifax-flails-after-announcing-enormous-breach/654149001/</a></p>
<p>After all, when did a credit-reporting company ever seem eager to please you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Alan Turner		</title>
		<link>https://sorrywatch.com/equifax-hacks-lax-apology-vexes/#comment-210959</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Turner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 00:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sorrywatch.com/?p=5356#comment-210959</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://sorrywatch.com/equifax-hacks-lax-apology-vexes/#comment-210957&quot;&gt;Linda S&lt;/a&gt;.

Good point.  We&#039;re not the customers, we&#039;re the product.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://sorrywatch.com/equifax-hacks-lax-apology-vexes/#comment-210957">Linda S</a>.</p>
<p>Good point.  We&#8217;re not the customers, we&#8217;re the product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Linda S		</title>
		<link>https://sorrywatch.com/equifax-hacks-lax-apology-vexes/#comment-210957</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Linda S]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2017 23:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sorrywatch.com/?p=5356#comment-210957</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Consumers, i.e., those whose information was compromised, are not their customers; those would be the businesses that use their services.  They don&#039;t care because they don&#039;t have to care.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consumers, i.e., those whose information was compromised, are not their customers; those would be the businesses that use their services.  They don&#8217;t care because they don&#8217;t have to care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
