<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Larry David, Jon Hamm and apologies!	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://sorrywatch.com/larry-david-jon-hamm-and-apologies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://sorrywatch.com/larry-david-jon-hamm-and-apologies/</link>
	<description>Analyzing apologies in the news, media, history and literature. We condemn the bad and exalt the good.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2020 01:57:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: sumac		</title>
		<link>https://sorrywatch.com/larry-david-jon-hamm-and-apologies/#comment-11461</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sumac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2013 18:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sorrywatch.com/?p=1663#comment-11461</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://sorrywatch.com/larry-david-jon-hamm-and-apologies/#comment-11422&quot;&gt;snarly&lt;/a&gt;.

I agree! Phew.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://sorrywatch.com/larry-david-jon-hamm-and-apologies/#comment-11422">snarly</a>.</p>
<p>I agree! Phew.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: snarly		</title>
		<link>https://sorrywatch.com/larry-david-jon-hamm-and-apologies/#comment-11422</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[snarly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 20:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sorrywatch.com/?p=1663#comment-11422</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://sorrywatch.com/larry-david-jon-hamm-and-apologies/#comment-11328&quot;&gt;sumac&lt;/a&gt;.

i think BOTH 1) and 2) are wrong!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://sorrywatch.com/larry-david-jon-hamm-and-apologies/#comment-11328">sumac</a>.</p>
<p>i think BOTH 1) and 2) are wrong!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: sumac		</title>
		<link>https://sorrywatch.com/larry-david-jon-hamm-and-apologies/#comment-11328</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sumac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 18:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sorrywatch.com/?p=1663#comment-11328</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Do we agree?

1) An apology has to be sincere. 2) That is all it has to be.

I think 2 is clearly wrong. As for 1, what about apologies from corporations? from sullen children? from ENEMIES ONE WISHES TO HUMBLE?

(Want to see movie!)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do we agree?</p>
<p>1) An apology has to be sincere. 2) That is all it has to be.</p>
<p>I think 2 is clearly wrong. As for 1, what about apologies from corporations? from sullen children? from ENEMIES ONE WISHES TO HUMBLE?</p>
<p>(Want to see movie!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
