Comments on: No, No, Nancy https://sorrywatch.com/no-no-nancy/ Analyzing apologies in the news, media, history and literature. We condemn the bad and exalt the good. Thu, 13 Aug 2020 18:49:50 +0000 hourly 1 By: bratschegirl https://sorrywatch.com/no-no-nancy/#comment-52357 Sat, 25 Oct 2014 13:02:12 +0000 https://sorrywatch.com/?p=3121#comment-52357 (pssst – “this episode caused” isn’t passive voice, it’s active, and unequivocally so. If it had said “that were caused by this episode,” that would have been passive.)

]]> By: S. McC https://sorrywatch.com/no-no-nancy/#comment-42375 Wed, 15 Oct 2014 18:07:30 +0000 https://sorrywatch.com/?p=3121#comment-42375 What’s the fuss at ME (the great and telegenic DOCTOR) for? Well really, it was just a semi-pdeudo-sort of-quasi quarantine anyway. (To make us look good and concerned.) And after all we volunteered out of out sense of higher purpose, initially – at first – right form the start; until they made it sort of, well, non-voluntary – kinda mandatory-like- ish – sort of.

Just sayin’

]]> By: gjk https://sorrywatch.com/no-no-nancy/#comment-42343 Wed, 15 Oct 2014 17:20:18 +0000 https://sorrywatch.com/?p=3121#comment-42343 But Nancy Snyderman MD is a GOOD person. She’d never infect anybody. SO THERE.

]]> By: tanita https://sorrywatch.com/no-no-nancy/#comment-41484 Tue, 14 Oct 2014 21:27:55 +0000 https://sorrywatch.com/?p=3121#comment-41484 Oh, WOW. Apparently there’s nothing in Princeton that delivers.

Is she also bullet-proof?

]]>