Comments on: Sexist scientist schmucks sorry-ish

By: What is that unfortunate smell? | SorryWatch

What is that unfortunate smell? | SorryWatch — Thu, 21 May 2015 05:34:47 +0000

[…] apology. “Regret is about the speaker’s feelings; apology is about the listener’s feelings,” says Snarly. Maybe we need a whole post focusing on the mistake of hiding behind “regret” when you’re […]

By: simple-touriste

simple-touriste — Fri, 08 May 2015 20:39:50 +0000

In reply to sumac. Hello??? What was in the paper, doofus?

By: sumac

sumac — Fri, 08 May 2015 20:29:26 +0000

In reply to simple-touriste. Wrong again.

By: simple-touriste

simple-touriste — Fri, 08 May 2015 19:08:30 +0000

In reply to sumac.

So the paper was NOT a “data round-up”.

You lose.

Go away.

By: sumac

sumac — Fri, 08 May 2015 18:57:53 +0000

In reply to sumac.

“The paper was a “data round-up”, or a “data round-up + analysis”. You can’t have it both ways.”

Silly. It doesn’t say “the paper was a data round-up and nothing but a data round-up.”

The world is full of middle roads.

By: simple-touriste

simple-touriste — Fri, 08 May 2015 05:57:59 +0000

In reply to sumac. The paper was a “data round-up”, or a “data round-up + analysis”. You can't have it both ways.

By: sumac

sumac — Thu, 07 May 2015 17:17:26 +0000

In reply to simple-touriste. No. Round up some data, then analyze it.

By: simple-touriste

simple-touriste — Thu, 07 May 2015 03:09:00 +0000

In reply to sumac. The paper was a "data round-up", or not. You can't have it both ways.

By: sumac

sumac — Thu, 07 May 2015 03:00:43 +0000

In reply to simple-touriste. No.

By: simple-touriste

simple-touriste — Thu, 07 May 2015 02:47:19 +0000

In reply to sumac. So you admit your "Note that the paper was a data round-up." remark was wrong, just as all your other remarks. Thank you.