<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Shaniqua-No-Ho: Crowd-funding when the crowd is surly	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://sorrywatch.com/shaniqua-no-ho-crowd-funding-when-the-crowd-is-surly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://sorrywatch.com/shaniqua-no-ho-crowd-funding-when-the-crowd-is-surly/</link>
	<description>Analyzing apologies in the news, media, history and literature. We condemn the bad and exalt the good.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2020 18:04:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: TaRaysha		</title>
		<link>https://sorrywatch.com/shaniqua-no-ho-crowd-funding-when-the-crowd-is-surly/#comment-9455</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TaRaysha]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 18:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sorrywatch.com/?p=1249#comment-9455</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://sorrywatch.com/shaniqua-no-ho-crowd-funding-when-the-crowd-is-surly/#comment-8007&quot;&gt;tanita&lt;/a&gt;.

Tanita is not any less ghetto than Tanisha. From TaRaysha...Yeah..I know.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://sorrywatch.com/shaniqua-no-ho-crowd-funding-when-the-crowd-is-surly/#comment-8007">tanita</a>.</p>
<p>Tanita is not any less ghetto than Tanisha. From TaRaysha&#8230;Yeah..I know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: marjorie		</title>
		<link>https://sorrywatch.com/shaniqua-no-ho-crowd-funding-when-the-crowd-is-surly/#comment-8073</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[marjorie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 17:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sorrywatch.com/?p=1249#comment-8073</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yes, whenever I write a story about hooked-nosed moneylending Jews, I give it to a Jew I know to look it over. He&#039;s one of the most determined, capable, intelligent, and culturally aware people I know. He built his own usury business from the ground up, and he rarely uses Christian children&#039;s blood in his matzohs. Where&#039;s his superhero?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, whenever I write a story about hooked-nosed moneylending Jews, I give it to a Jew I know to look it over. He&#8217;s one of the most determined, capable, intelligent, and culturally aware people I know. He built his own usury business from the ground up, and he rarely uses Christian children&#8217;s blood in his matzohs. Where&#8217;s his superhero?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: sumac		</title>
		<link>https://sorrywatch.com/shaniqua-no-ho-crowd-funding-when-the-crowd-is-surly/#comment-8063</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sumac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 16:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sorrywatch.com/?p=1249#comment-8063</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yeah, exactly. I fear they thought it was edgy.

Here&#039;s what they said on Reddit about their consultant.

&lt;cite&gt;...we actually got a sex worker to look over the script. She’s one of the most determined, capable, intelligent, and culturally aware people I know. She built her own business from the ground up. She’s happily married. She’s overcome abuse and works against patriarchal oppression pretty much on a daily basis, so why shouldn’t she get her own superhero?&lt;/cite&gt;

I try to work against the stupidity pretty much on a daily basis, so where&#039;s my superhero?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, exactly. I fear they thought it was edgy.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what they said on Reddit about their consultant.</p>
<p><cite>&#8230;we actually got a sex worker to look over the script. She’s one of the most determined, capable, intelligent, and culturally aware people I know. She built her own business from the ground up. She’s happily married. She’s overcome abuse and works against patriarchal oppression pretty much on a daily basis, so why shouldn’t she get her own superhero?</cite></p>
<p>I try to work against the stupidity pretty much on a daily basis, so where&#8217;s my superhero?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: tanita		</title>
		<link>https://sorrywatch.com/shaniqua-no-ho-crowd-funding-when-the-crowd-is-surly/#comment-8007</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tanita]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 15:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sorrywatch.com/?p=1249#comment-8007</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hoo, boy. The NAME Shaniqua - or almost anything that ends with a &#039;-sha&#039; or a &#039;-qua&#039; gets my back up - I even get shirty with people who call me Tanisha - because, among other reasons, &lt;i&gt;it&#039;s not my name&lt;/i&gt;. But, you&#039;d be surprised by how many people think it&#039;s &quot;close enough.&quot;

How these guys could have been so vacuous and blind is kind of terrifying. And their apology achieves a kind of ultimate vacuousness as well - you&#039;re right. Abject, but vague and mainly concerned with fending off more anger.

I really question the &quot;research&quot; they did, and the sex-workers they allegedly asked, and I cannot help but think that they should have known that they were taking part in stereotype and caricature with just the name Shaniqua, not to mention the hypersexualizing. I mean, they want to hide behind being well intentioned and unintentionally offensive, but REALLY??? DUH.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hoo, boy. The NAME Shaniqua &#8211; or almost anything that ends with a &#8216;-sha&#8217; or a &#8216;-qua&#8217; gets my back up &#8211; I even get shirty with people who call me Tanisha &#8211; because, among other reasons, <i>it&#8217;s not my name</i>. But, you&#8217;d be surprised by how many people think it&#8217;s &#8220;close enough.&#8221;</p>
<p>How these guys could have been so vacuous and blind is kind of terrifying. And their apology achieves a kind of ultimate vacuousness as well &#8211; you&#8217;re right. Abject, but vague and mainly concerned with fending off more anger.</p>
<p>I really question the &#8220;research&#8221; they did, and the sex-workers they allegedly asked, and I cannot help but think that they should have known that they were taking part in stereotype and caricature with just the name Shaniqua, not to mention the hypersexualizing. I mean, they want to hide behind being well intentioned and unintentionally offensive, but REALLY??? DUH.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
