<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Technically not a lie. In our opinion. Psych!	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://sorrywatch.com/technically-not-a-lie-in-our-opinion-psych/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://sorrywatch.com/technically-not-a-lie-in-our-opinion-psych/</link>
	<description>Analyzing apologies in the news, media, history and literature. We condemn the bad and exalt the good.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2020 01:43:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: sumac		</title>
		<link>https://sorrywatch.com/technically-not-a-lie-in-our-opinion-psych/#comment-215660</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sumac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2020 01:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sorrywatch.com/?p=10204#comment-215660</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://sorrywatch.com/technically-not-a-lie-in-our-opinion-psych/#comment-215647&quot;&gt;Kenneth H. Ryesky&lt;/a&gt;.

Sounds like an excellent appeal of a shady denial. You might appreciate the many strategies used by the U.S. Navy to dodge a FOIA request in one of our earlier posts... and how those strategies came to light.

https://sorrywatch.com/the-navy-regrets/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://sorrywatch.com/technically-not-a-lie-in-our-opinion-psych/#comment-215647">Kenneth H. Ryesky</a>.</p>
<p>Sounds like an excellent appeal of a shady denial. You might appreciate the many strategies used by the U.S. Navy to dodge a FOIA request in one of our earlier posts&#8230; and how those strategies came to light.</p>
<p><a href="https://sorrywatch.com/the-navy-regrets/" rel="ugc">https://sorrywatch.com/the-navy-regrets/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kenneth H. Ryesky		</title>
		<link>https://sorrywatch.com/technically-not-a-lie-in-our-opinion-psych/#comment-215647</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kenneth H. Ryesky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2020 18:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sorrywatch.com/?p=10204#comment-215647</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[When it comes to Freedom of Information requests, governmental agencies seem to have a tendency to assert that the requested records are not under their cognizance, but are kept by some other entity (governmental or otherwise).

In 1992, I made a New York State Freedom of Information Law request regarding the controversial appearance of one Khalled Muhammed at SUNY Stony Brook.  The initial response was that Mr. Muhammed&#039;s appearance &quot;was sponsored by a number of campus organizations all funded under the student government association called Polity. Polity is an independent corporation and not subject to the state Freedom of Information Law.&quot;

I appealed the denial, noting the following:

&quot;Mr. Muhammed appeared in the Staller Center, a SUNY facility. Mr. Muhammed&#039;s speech was obviously recorded. It would seem that SUNY personnel were involved in the presentation at the Staller Center. (If University personnel were not so involved, then one can only wonder which provisions of the applicable labor-management agreements were breached.).

Mr. Muhammed was accompanied by his own security personnel, who were reportedly armed. Even if such individuals were unarmed, it is obvious that arrangements and coordination with SUNY security forces were (or should have been) made in advance, and paperwork generated thereby. SUNY should not knowingly consent to invasions of its campuses by outsiders, armed or otherwise, without permission, cognizance, direction, and control by SUNY security forces.&quot;

I received a tranche of interesting documents.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to Freedom of Information requests, governmental agencies seem to have a tendency to assert that the requested records are not under their cognizance, but are kept by some other entity (governmental or otherwise).</p>
<p>In 1992, I made a New York State Freedom of Information Law request regarding the controversial appearance of one Khalled Muhammed at SUNY Stony Brook.  The initial response was that Mr. Muhammed&#8217;s appearance &#8220;was sponsored by a number of campus organizations all funded under the student government association called Polity. Polity is an independent corporation and not subject to the state Freedom of Information Law.&#8221;</p>
<p>I appealed the denial, noting the following:</p>
<p>&#8220;Mr. Muhammed appeared in the Staller Center, a SUNY facility. Mr. Muhammed&#8217;s speech was obviously recorded. It would seem that SUNY personnel were involved in the presentation at the Staller Center. (If University personnel were not so involved, then one can only wonder which provisions of the applicable labor-management agreements were breached.).</p>
<p>Mr. Muhammed was accompanied by his own security personnel, who were reportedly armed. Even if such individuals were unarmed, it is obvious that arrangements and coordination with SUNY security forces were (or should have been) made in advance, and paperwork generated thereby. SUNY should not knowingly consent to invasions of its campuses by outsiders, armed or otherwise, without permission, cognizance, direction, and control by SUNY security forces.&#8221;</p>
<p>I received a tranche of interesting documents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: The Quarantine Cat Report		</title>
		<link>https://sorrywatch.com/technically-not-a-lie-in-our-opinion-psych/#comment-215587</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Quarantine Cat Report]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2020 20:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sorrywatch.com/?p=10204#comment-215587</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] work news, my co-SorryWatcher did a great post on some serious apology-weaseling by the New Orleans Police Department.&#160;I reviewed National Book Award nominee The Way Back by Gavriel Savit for the New York Times [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] work news, my co-SorryWatcher did a great post on some serious apology-weaseling by the New Orleans Police Department.&nbsp;I reviewed National Book Award nominee The Way Back by Gavriel Savit for the New York Times [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: paulbel		</title>
		<link>https://sorrywatch.com/technically-not-a-lie-in-our-opinion-psych/#comment-215584</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[paulbel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2020 03:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sorrywatch.com/?p=10204#comment-215584</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d recognize those big beautiful eyes anywhere, on anyone.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d recognize those big beautiful eyes anywhere, on anyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chuck Karish		</title>
		<link>https://sorrywatch.com/technically-not-a-lie-in-our-opinion-psych/#comment-215583</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chuck Karish]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2020 02:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sorrywatch.com/?p=10204#comment-215583</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Simultaneously protecting self and others from virus transmission AND testing for power to smell blossoms AND challenging face recognition software to do its job when a mask  covers the majority of the recognizable features!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simultaneously protecting self and others from virus transmission AND testing for power to smell blossoms AND challenging face recognition software to do its job when a mask  covers the majority of the recognizable features!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
