<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Yippee! A good apology for transphobia from Esquire Philippines!	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://sorrywatch.com/yippee-a-good-apology-for-transphobia-from-esquire-philippines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://sorrywatch.com/yippee-a-good-apology-for-transphobia-from-esquire-philippines/</link>
	<description>Analyzing apologies in the news, media, history and literature. We condemn the bad and exalt the good.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2020 17:42:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: tanita		</title>
		<link>https://sorrywatch.com/yippee-a-good-apology-for-transphobia-from-esquire-philippines/#comment-209291</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tanita]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2017 20:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sorrywatch.com/?p=5191#comment-209291</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This lands squarely the category of &quot;I mock you because I love you&quot; type offense. It&#039;s like when people say &#039;no offense&#039; -- you know they really are meaning to be just as offensive as possible.

Which makes me still believe the writer knew the mockery was wrong; the magazine apologized handsomely, which makes it sound a little better, but seriously? I still feel they apologized because they got their backsides handed to them.

But, yeah. If Jake is cool, then I&#039;ll shut up.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This lands squarely the category of &#8220;I mock you because I love you&#8221; type offense. It&#8217;s like when people say &#8216;no offense&#8217; &#8212; you know they really are meaning to be just as offensive as possible.</p>
<p>Which makes me still believe the writer knew the mockery was wrong; the magazine apologized handsomely, which makes it sound a little better, but seriously? I still feel they apologized because they got their backsides handed to them.</p>
<p>But, yeah. If Jake is cool, then I&#8217;ll shut up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
