<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: You&#8217;re welcome to watch and cheer for us	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://sorrywatch.com/youre-welcome-to-watch-and-cheer-for-us/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://sorrywatch.com/youre-welcome-to-watch-and-cheer-for-us/</link>
	<description>Analyzing apologies in the news, media, history and literature. We condemn the bad and exalt the good.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2020 21:17:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: nancy robinson		</title>
		<link>https://sorrywatch.com/youre-welcome-to-watch-and-cheer-for-us/#comment-46702</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nancy robinson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2014 20:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sorrywatch.com/?p=3141#comment-46702</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Often the apologetic situations that SorryWatch highlights are depressing. Spot-on as the SW analysis is, I&#039;m never confident that the apologis/a-hole t in question has/will learn a damned thing. This post, however, has me feeling a bit hopeful? Is that the right name for this feeling? It&#039;s been so long...)

These dudes worked it out eventually, once the tech bros let go of their &quot;it&#039;s not fair (for us) entitlement.&quot;They didn&#039;t even need their big daddy companies to intervene (that intervention was worthless anyway, as is most pr-centric statements.) So that made me feel good. Thanks, SorryWatch!

 As for Parks &#038; Rec, I just assume all Parks &#038; Recs are floundering and unable to handle most situations due to under-staffing, lack of funds, and neglect. I mean, $27 as a fee. And I bet there&#039;s a too-complicated, try to be fair formula that was used to get to that number. It&#039;s not that $27 is or isn&#039;t much money. It&#039;s just a further reflection of how city parks are in a constant state of good-willed befuddlement. Getting mad about that is like being pissed at a 3-legged dog who&#039;s wandered onto the field.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Often the apologetic situations that SorryWatch highlights are depressing. Spot-on as the SW analysis is, I&#8217;m never confident that the apologis/a-hole t in question has/will learn a damned thing. This post, however, has me feeling a bit hopeful? Is that the right name for this feeling? It&#8217;s been so long&#8230;)</p>
<p>These dudes worked it out eventually, once the tech bros let go of their &#8220;it&#8217;s not fair (for us) entitlement.&#8221;They didn&#8217;t even need their big daddy companies to intervene (that intervention was worthless anyway, as is most pr-centric statements.) So that made me feel good. Thanks, SorryWatch!</p>
<p> As for Parks &amp; Rec, I just assume all Parks &amp; Recs are floundering and unable to handle most situations due to under-staffing, lack of funds, and neglect. I mean, $27 as a fee. And I bet there&#8217;s a too-complicated, try to be fair formula that was used to get to that number. It&#8217;s not that $27 is or isn&#8217;t much money. It&#8217;s just a further reflection of how city parks are in a constant state of good-willed befuddlement. Getting mad about that is like being pissed at a 3-legged dog who&#8217;s wandered onto the field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: tanita		</title>
		<link>https://sorrywatch.com/youre-welcome-to-watch-and-cheer-for-us/#comment-44767</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tanita]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2014 23:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sorrywatch.com/?p=3141#comment-44767</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Man, I wish I was that awesomely immovable and articulate when I was young. (Or, heck, even now.) I&#039;m pretty sure I would have curled up and said, &quot;Tech Guys? Guess I&#039;ll go home.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, I wish I was that awesomely immovable and articulate when I was young. (Or, heck, even now.) I&#8217;m pretty sure I would have curled up and said, &#8220;Tech Guys? Guess I&#8217;ll go home.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
