Urban Outfitters sells some “vintage” clothes as well as new. Used clothes. Mostly shirts from college teams, schools, or amusingly named organizations. Cobleskill Football – $129. Iowa State University – $129. Providence College Hockey Camp – $149. Texas Int’l Airlines – $139. They’re overpriced, possibly condescending, and save you the trouble of going to a thrift store. They also have some highly distressed jeans/overalls. $650 for a “Vintage French Repaired Overall.” (So distressed it’s practically in crisis, but someone has snatched it up.)
Also – too late to buy this, or even find it on their site – a Kent State University sweatshirt. Unlike the others it’s unevenly stained and mottled with red. Unlike the others, it has half a dozen round dark red spots and holes over where a person’s heart might be.
I mentioned the Kent State University logo, didn’t I? Kent State, where in 1970 13 students were shot, four them killed, when Ohio National Guard troops opened fire? That Kent State.
People thought that offering an apparent Kent State massacre victim’s garment was horrible and in the worst of taste. They said so. Kent State officials were upset too. Dean Kahler, who was paralyzed in the 1970 shootings, said “Urban Outfitters continues to perpetuate a low standard of ethics.” Urban Outfitter took down the picture, and issued this apology:
Urban Outfitters sincerely apologizes for any offense our Vintage Kent State Sweatshirt may have caused. It was never our intention to allude to the tragic events that took place at Kent State in 1970 and we are extremely saddened that this item was perceived as such. The one-of-a-kind item was purchased as part of our sun-faded vintage collection. There is no blood on this shirt nor has this item been altered in any way. The red stains are discoloration from the original shade of the shirt and the holes are from natural wear and fray. Again, we deeply regret that this item was perceived negatively and we have removed it immediately from our website to avoid further upset.
Bah. What part of that do I believe? I do believe that’s not real blood, and that this is not a death garment. I believe they wish they hadn’t put it up.
But I am skeptical that the markings are “natural discoloration” and “natural wear and fray.” I own some fairly grotty old garments and none of them have developed bullet holes.
I don’t think Urban Outfitters altered the shirt to create the markings. That’s too much effort for a $129 item. Probably someone other than Urban Outfitters thought it would be hilarious to mock up a death sweat shirt. Maybe they realized their mistake, and released the shirt into the sea of used clothing out there. Urban Outfitters fished it out.
Did they offer it unknowingly? Unlikely, given that the other vintage” shirts offered for sale don’t have that kind of staining/spotting/fray. I think it was their “intention to allude to the tragic events that took place at Kent State.”
Urban Outfitters says that didn’t happen, and the evil is all in the eye of the beholder. I call that despicable blame-shifting.
But remember, they “are extremely saddened that this item was perceived as such.”
Corporate day of mourning! Print up some shirts!
I was hoping you would tackle this CACA!
I, snarly, feel less passionate about this than sumac does. Please do not stone me (or riddle me with real or virtual bullet holes), but my feeling is that this is one shirt, sold on the one-of-a-kind vintage portion of the site. It was not a line of shirts. Even if we think Urban Outfitters is lying about not deliberately distressing the one shirt to make it look bloody, I’d distinguish between one shirt (“distressed” either by one dimwit outside the company or one dimwit inside the company, with deliberate echoes of violence or not, and put up in the vintage section by another dimwit in the company) and the LINES of shirts Urban Outfitters has actually manufactured that are undeniably offensive. The company has produced actual vast numbers of anti-Semitic, anti-Irish, and pro-eating-disorders shirts, and insulted the Navajo and ripped off independent artists. I’ve boycotted UO personally for years because of the company founder’s history of donations to Rick Santorum. And yet I worry that we’re too quick to be outraged and we risk burning out. I worry that issues like this (ONE SHIRT! not a line! ONE SHIRT! When it’s a LINE, we can talk!) (I realize I’m being sorta arbitrary here!) distract us from meaningful societal problems we can and should work to solve. Like, maybe law-enforcement brutality, warmongering and gun violence. (All that said: I support sumac’s outrage. There is plenty to go around, and your charming hosts can differ and remain buds.)