On Tuesday, 40 kids among the 500+ students at Uintah Elementary School in Salt Lake City had their lunches taken away and thrown out. This was ordered by a district Child Nutrition Manager (HA), because the kids’ parents had balances due on school lunch payments.
According to the Salt Lake City Tribune, “cafeteria workers weren’t able to see which children owed money until they had already received lunches,” so after the kids were all served, the staffers took some lunches away and tossed them “because once food is served to one student it can’t be served to another.”
The parasite children were allowed milk and fruit.
Talking Points Memo quoted school district spokesman Jason Olsen: “If students were humiliated and upset, that’s very unfortunate and not what we wanted to happen.” And Mr. Olson, if your eyeball hurts after I flick it with my forefinger, that’s very unfortunate and not what I wanted to happen. It’s just that I get twitchy when bureaucrats offer terrible “if” apologies, and my finger does things. In addition, wimpy constructions like “that’s very unfortunate” cause me to have an unfortunate reaction that I did not want to happen, like thinking that many people in the “Child Nutrition Department” in the Salt Lake City school district should lose their jobs. Oh wait, no, that’s not unfortunate at all and I do want that to happen. My mistake. Apologies.
In a note on its Facebook page, the Salt Lake City compounded its horrid apologizing by first launching into a couple of paragraphs about how they’d TRIED contacting the parents of the de-lunched students for TWO WHOLE DAYS, if you include the day the lunches were taken away. Which would technically be a day and a half, but who’s counting. And they NOBLY gave the freeloader spawn a fruit and a milk OUT OF THE GOODNESS OF THEIR HEARTS, “so children who don’t have money for lunch can at least have some food and not go without.” I WEEP WITH THE GENEROSITY. The statement explains that children pick up their lunches before they get to the computer, so there was NO WAY OF KNOWING which children’s lunches had to be stripped from their tiny, grasping, mooching hands.
The apology part doesn’t come until the fifth paragraph: “This situation could have and should have been handled in a different manner. We apologize.”
Well THAT was effusive.
Then the next paragraph goes on to imply that this is all the school’s fault anyway, since it’s the school’s job to tell families when they’re in arrears, and a lot of the families said they were shocked by the whole “publicly taking away children’s food because you’re behind on payments” thing, so yeah, did we just say “we apologize”? We meant “you should totes demand the principal’s head on a pike” because he was supposed to TELL YOU that we were going to humiliate your kids. Or you know what, get the cafeteria manager’s head! Yes! “The district has specific guidelines for school kitchen managers on how parents should be notified, and we are currently investigating to see if these guidelines were followed correctly.” See, we are investigating! Not ourselves and our child nutrition department, but OTHER people, who are NOT the people who ordered the children’s lunches taken away from them in front of their peers. Look, a tree!
Hungry kids can’t learn. Because they’re hungry. Not letting kids go hungry is kind of fundamental. Most teachers and administrators understand that. Indeed, as one of the commenters on the Facebook page pointed out:
A friend of mine is a school teacher in Kentucky. His school district recently had a snow day in a Friday. The superintendent was so concerned that low-income kids would not have enough to eat for the weekend, he had all the central office staff bag lunches and personally drive the food out to the homes of the kids who received subsidized lunches.
In NYC, there is a free breakfast and lunch program in the schools every day during the summer, because school is sometimes the only place poor kids can get a good meal. I’m sure there are similar protections in other towns and cities (and you should feel free to tell us about them in comments).
Hey, Salt Lake City School District, maybe you wanna take down the FIGHT CHILD HUNGER post on the FRONT PAGE of your web site:
And try apologizing again. Maybe a kid can tell you how.
I must say how much I love SorryWatch, especially this post
I am so sorry for those poor “Nutrition Managers” (yeah, they managed those kids’ nutrition alright) who have to look at themselves in the mirror and see the person who snatched food from a hungry child and then threw it away in front of them. I’m sure that they are plagued with restless sleep in which they dream that giants come and give them yummy treats and then snatch them away and laugh and laugh and laugh. Because of course they are human beings, and any human being would have a guilty conscience after doing something so horrible, wouldn’t they?
To say nothing of the “apology” which literally adds insult to injury. I would like to see the SLC District come up with an interesting penalty that teaches them humanity and empathy (maybe something like the giants scenario above, come to think of it.)
Two things you don’t want to teach kids (by example):
HOW TO BE MEAN
and
HOW TO WASTE FOOD
Here is a contact page for Jason Olsen: http://www.slcschools.org/depts/communications/contact.php
Yes, our district has a summer lunch program. Also, in my kids’ school (and one other in the district), they just give everyone free breakfast and lunch. Everyone. This is a USDA option that any district with a high concentration of poverty can take, and it benefits the district because they get something like $2.67 per lunch from USDA, while they used to charge us $2.50, and because it’s free, kids are more likely to buy lunch (I know I lean on my kids to buy as often as possible) so the effect multiplies, and there’s no free-lunch stigma, and kids get fed. I think I read that Boston is doing it too.
I like this. It sounds like the right way to go about it.
This makes me want to do two things:
1. Cry.
2. Kick a few people in the SLC school system.
The sad thing is, perfectly reheated, over-salted processed lunch food went into the garbage, saving the school district exactly $0.
Privilege, man.
WOW.
Wow. Not too long ago,, I read a piece on how kudos go to Utah, for solving 78% of their homeless problem. …apparently they’re only good with giving you an empty house and a social worker. Heaven forbid your kids try to eat enough to survive growing up to keep the house.
People are no damn good…
Our district has a summer breakfast and lunch program regardless of need. All children receive free breakfast during the school year, regardless of need. Lunches are still paid for or subsidized during the school year. I’m not sure why. I do know this, if a kid in our school has a cafeteria balance, we make sure the child still eats a cold sandwich, milk and juice/fruit. How can anyone send a child into a cafeteria with nothing to eat? It’s shameful.
The manager in question is on “paid administrative leave.” Also known as “vacation.”
http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/57472249-78/district-lunch-lunches-students.html.csp
Asshole.
Well, they’re investigating. If they decide the administrator is the person responsible, it seems that vacation will end in firing….
Ugh!
Aargh!
Grrr!