Mattel, which owns the Scrabble brand, decided their popular mobile Scrabble-playing app could be even more popular. They got Electronic Arts (EA) to administer and make it so. As Mattel later noted, “We produce the board game but we’re not experts in electronics.”

The many users of the Scrabble app should have been delighted (if they knew about it). Yay, the consultants are here! Things can only get better!

For that is how it usually goes, is it not?

EA changed the app so it can be played in six languages. Players can customize their boards. Oooh, you can pay extra to get a version without ads. So cool.

Korean women playing go. (Cornell University Library.)

Playing go because mobile Scrabble not available. (Cornell University Library.)

They also changed the dictionary. It no longer uses the Chambers dictionary, but instead uses the Collins dictionary. The first time you try to use your favorite bit of Welsh dialect and it’s not a word is a shocker.

The game lost the feature of automatically refreshing after a turn. It lost the timer mode. Worst by far, all player histories, contact lists, and statistics were dumped. Helen Hawkins told the BBC that she’d racked up a 71% win rate in 5,000+ games she’d played in the last four years. (We’ll have to take her word for it, since the data’s been tossed.) “It’s hopeless compared with the old version,” said Hawkins.

“See end-of-game results and stats” promises the “SCRABBLE FREE for iPhone” page. Yes, until they think up a more remunerative model and dump the stats.

Photo: Gary Lee Todd. GNU Free Documentation License Version 1.2

Playing liubo in the afterlife because mobile Scrabble not available.

John Lewis told the Yorkshire Post about the wiped contact lists. “Over the years people had made friendships all over the world, but without warning those contacts disappeared. In other cases it was a really lovely way for relatives, who live thousands of miles apart, to keep in touch. The changes mean you can’t choose who you play, you just get presented with a random partner. It has destroyed the social side of the game which was incredibly important for a lot of people.”

They’re not the only angry ones. See the Facebook page, “Bring back the Scrabble we love.”

Apparently if you email a complaint, the response is, “Hi [your name], thanks a lot for providing us with your feedback. We’ll be sure to share this request with the development team to help prioritize feature updates in the future.”

Mattel told the BBC it wouldn’t be possible to get the data back. “As part of the transition, we were unable to carry over ongoing games and statistics, the timer mode and the manual match-making function. The new version will have the same robust statistics moving forward.” We trashed your social history, but WE’VE MOVED ON.

“We are sorry we weren’t able to please everybody,” a Mattel spokesperson said. But hey, “The number of people playing has also increased significantly since the update.”

Terrible apology. “Sorry we weren’t able to please everybody”? (Say it in a singsong. “SORry we weren’t AYble to please EVrybody!” End with a dismissive tongue click.) Some people were pleased, and we care about them more than you. They outnumber you, Mr & Ms Small Potatoes. (I’m not actually convinced that’s true, but I don’t have any numbers to back up my suspicions.)

Surprisingly many people whose job is to speak to the public do not comprehend apology. They don’t even know how to pretend to be sorry. They fall back on what they know about apology in their personal life, often next to nothing. They resort to schoolyard defenses. Nobody likes you anyway. You walk funny. Your mother dresses you like a baby. You only play Scrabble in one language.

Photo: Nationaal Archief, Den Haag, Rijksfotoarchief: Fotocollectie Algemeen Nederlands Fotopersbureau (ANEFO), 1945-1989 - negatiefstroken zwart/wit, nummer toegang 2.24.01.05, bestanddeelnummer 910-9357 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Netherlands license.

Playing chess because mobile Scrab – hey, where’s my FOOD?

If we think about it, we know that corporations care more about making money than about their customers. Often, making money and treating customers well go together. Then the human beings who work for the corporate “person” can pretend that the “person” really cares about the customers and would never flash-freeze us and ship us to China to be rendered into pink slime and ship us back to the US to adulterate the fast food they sell our children, if the law permitted such a thing, no matter how great the profit margin.

 

Pin It on Pinterest

Share